
3 April, 2025
New plans submitted for Custom House redevelopment
Learn more
1 March, 2024 · 1 min read
On 1st March 2023, the High Court (J Lieven) quashed the Secretary of State’s (July 2023) decision to refuse planning permission for the redevelopment of Marks and Spencer’s store on Oxford Street.
Montagu Evans acted as Historic Environment and Townscape advisers.
M&S succeeded on five of the six grounds of challenge:
2. The Secretary of State unlawfully failed to explain why he disagreed with his Inspector’s conclusion that there was no viable and deliverable alternative to the proposed scheme;
3. The Secretary of State unlawfully failed “to grapple with the implications of refusal and the loss of the benefits and thus departure from important Development Plan policies;
4. The Secretary of State unlawfully failed to provide adequate reasons for concluding (in disagreement with the Inspector) that the harm to the vitality and viability of Oxford Street would be “limited if M&S’s scheme (or an alternative) were not delivered;
5. The Secretary of State’s erred through a factual error and by a misinterpretation of development plan policy on carbon. The judgment confirms that offsetting requirements in the London Plan are in relation to operational carbon, and not embodied carbon. J Lieven found that the misinterpretation may have led the Secretary of State to draw a different conclusion than he would have done otherwise.
Timur Tatlioglu, Chris Miele, Nick Pond and Helen Marrison advised for Montagu Evans.
Congratulations to Marks and Spencer and its legal team, Russell Harris KC and Heather Sargent, as well as Roy Pinnock, Megan Forbes and Melanie Blanchard at Dentons.
The full judgment is here: https://assets.caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/admin/2024/452/ewhc_admin_2024_452.pdf
Image Credit: Marks and Spencer
12 March, 2025
by Jon Neale
Learn more
18 February, 2025
by Alex Nesti, Eleanor Mazzon, James Huish
Learn more
12 February, 2025
Learn more